this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
107 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

17352 readers
377 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogsototh@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

purescript if you count “compile to js” as compiled.

Otherwise Haskell

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's transpiling, not compiling. Compiling is usually meant as "directly to machine code", but I am yet to find an "official definition".

[–] AbelianGrape@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

There is no official definition, in part because there isn't any formal way to define the term that satisfies our intuition.

Most treatments will handle "transpiling" as a special case of "compiling" and some will even handle decompilation as a special case where the object language is higher level than the source. Of course, even defining "higher level" can be quite hard.

Plenty of languages "compile to C" and I see no issue with saying something "compiles to js," especially given that js mostly lacks features of purescript rather than the other way around.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

transpiling is just a type of compiling. compiling in no terms means 'directly to machine code'.