this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
130 points (93.9% liked)

Firefox

18068 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thebigslime@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

LibreWolf for desktop, Mull for Android.

[–] jangdonggun@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

Keep in mind both LibreWolf and Mull are very slow because LibreWolf disabled WebGL, enabling higher privacy features, and Mull disabled JIT, a massive performance hit.

This is for people who don't know then blaming Firefox being slow, LibreWolf and Mull are slower version of Firefox, just that.

[–] delirious_owl 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aren't those Firefox with some patches?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well yes, but it's the patches that make them special. Every Firefox fork that disables Mozilla PPA by default is another browser that cuts into Mozilla's attempt to resell private data to advertisers while marketing it as private (which is, I kid you not, a reason they say they needed it enabled by default).

And considering Firefox itself is still open source, it's a completely valid browser to base a fork off of. Especially when the only serviceable alternative is Chrome right now.

[–] delirious_owl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't chromium open source too?

[–] linuxPIPEpower@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

someone else can probably give a more comprehensive/correct answer but here is how I understand it. i believe chromium is open source and chrome is mostly chromium but also some proprietary (and therefor unknown) bits are included. whereas firefox is entirely open source, meaning you could compile it yourself and still end up with the same package.