471
submitted 2 days ago by golden_zealot@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

You might be right, but I don't think that's a problem they're going to solve all on their own, meanwhile the rest of users will suffer.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 hours ago

So, instead, they should cater to an industry that has long been a known vector for malware, abuse, and PII theft?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

that is the only current accepted alternative to paying for website access, yes

if you have better ideas though, we'd all love to hear them

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 hours ago

Your stance appears to be roughly "we've tried nothing and are all out of ideas, so let's keep doing objectively harmful things".

The simplest idea is not to accept the premise that an objectively harmful business model that only brings value to a shrinking minority is acceptable. Maybe commercialism of every part of the web isn't something that humanity needs. As for paying for access, there are plenty of extant models that have never been attempted with any seriousness.

Then again, the whole Linux ecosystem is able to thrive without bending the knee to the ad industry. There's no reason that a web browser cannot also thrive without ads except for a lack of desire to do so.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
471 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
1209 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS