this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1690 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5801 readers
3418 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm aware its not a technical problem, I was using the word ironically to point out the person I was responding to was wrong to say it...

Also saying we can at any time fix a problem is just being ignorant of the many near impossible steps needed to fix the problem. In this case the problem is capitalism. We could come up with ways to end capitalism or make capitalism work in the interest of humanity, but will it realistically ever happen? No it wont, private money won, look at the topics discussed for presidential debate, never a mention of doing something about private capital owning Washington. Just super effective wedge issues.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're being too broad. We don't need to undo all of capitalism here. Nationalising the electric grid is a reasonable solution to this particular problem.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What incentive does a politician have to support nationalizing the power grid? It wont be a super splashy issue to tackle so it isnt worth doing it for the credit, and the different power companies of the world will just put their money into buying opposition to your effort anyways.

That's the problem with capitalism is that any single thing you would want to do that would impact some cocksuckers capital, and the threat alone makes it a necessity to pay to win in congress. Usually the only way stuff like this happens is because there is new capital entering the market that can afford to donate against the old capital to overtake them. Its just rich assholes all the way down.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the government seizes control of a major industry, that's a lot of power and opportunity for politicians. It's already been done in some local areas, and it had the broad support of the people because "the electric company is gouging us, the gov should take it over" is an easy sell.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I just don't think it's feasible at a federal level. Or even for some states (Newsom refusing to do anything about SDGE comes to mind) It's so easy to cry socialism about this topic too.

I also think there might be a disconnect between government power and politician power.