Asklemmy

43907 readers

1364 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Will something be done about moderators owning 50+ magazines/communities and counting? Already seeing power mods migrate from Reddit trying to hoard as many communities as possible. (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by scientiam@kbin.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Will something be done about moderators owning 50+ magazines/communities and counting? Already seeing power mods migrate from Reddit trying to hoard as many communities as possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Whitt@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the problem with this?

If they can moderate that many groups to the standard each community is happy with is it an issue?

[–] neonfire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Centralized power in the hands of a few is a bad thing. People have been complaining about power-tripping Reddit power mods for years.

Because what happens when they don't mod to the standard the community wants?