1261
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] guillem@aussie.zone 86 points 3 days ago

Gen X ignored again, with which we are okay though.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 59 points 3 days ago
[-] Irinir@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago
[-] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

You know he's never going to give it to you.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Bot you just know that he's never gonna give you up

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 9 points 3 days ago
[-] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

I was gonna post that but then I was, like, whatever.

[-] toddalon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

Exactly the comment I was looking for. Tip of the hat to you.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Only thing that isn't okay is to mangle your sentence to conform to the obsolete "never end a sentence with a preposition because some old fogey said so hundreds of years ago" rule ๐Ÿ˜›

[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I'm ok with ignoring this rule. Most of us do anyway. While we're at it, can we also put "never split the infinitive" on the chopping block?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago
[-] guillem@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

ESL here, what would have been the more natural way?

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

What you wrote was fine. Some people don't like that sentence structure for stupid reasons

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

It's an invented prescriptionist rule that was imported from studying Latin. You can completely ignore it and you'll get more natural sounding language.

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

It's the "with which we are okay" that sounds a little stilted. Most speakers would probably phrase that part of the sentence as "which we're okay with." It's just because "okay with" is so common that it almost feels like a transitive form of the verb "to be okay," so splitting apart sounds odd.

Note that there's already a different transitive verb "okay" which means "approve" or "authorize," as in "the boss okayed your plan to use the forklift," implying that the person doing this has authority or control over whether the thing happens. "I'm okay with it" by contrast typically means something like "I have no control over it but it also doesn't trouble me." "Unfazed by" (spelled in this way, not related to "phase") would be a similar expression.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Same here. There's probably other ways too, but personally I'd probably have gone with "and we're okay with that" or "and that's fine/okay with us". Just flows more like naturally IMO.

BTW, in spite of the tongue in cheek way in which I said it, I meant no personal ill will towards you. Just the rule and its tyranny ๐Ÿ˜‰

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
1261 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45284 readers
2154 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS