this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
640 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2801 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And they expect you to do this for free?

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 month ago

If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Nah, they get “Exposure”!

/s

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

For profit corporations don't deserve your volunteer work.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And yet if you aren't a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed that you should have some kind of "service" on your CV, but reviewing is pretty low impact. And if you want to review, you can choose something other than the predatory publishers.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Such as? They're all predatory just to varying degrees.