I know historical hindsight is 20/20, but how did no one bully this guy into giving up his moronic "de-stalinisation" policy? Like the SU was built by Stalin and now suddenly hes satan incarnate? No wonder SU citizens lost faith in the party over time, how can you trust a bunch of weather vanes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Read about Trofim Lysenko. He said the concept of a gene was bourgeois.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In private, however, Stalin ridiculed Lysenko’s view that every science had a “class character”, writing on a report by Lysenko: “Ha-ha-ha…And Mathematics? And Darwinism?”

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The guy was legitimately a dumbass I don't know why Stalin kept him around and edited his speeches. He caused a ton of harm to agriculture and genetics. His idea on grafting trees has to be one of the most foolish things I've read in a while. Even worse, Khrushchev got rid of him, then brought him back to do more damage for another decade, before getting rid of him again.

[–] Hewaoijsdb@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Source?

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Editing Nature: Joseph Stalin and the "New" Soviet Biology in Isis vol. 84 (4) pp. 728-745 (1993) DOI: 10.1086/356638

https://libstc.cc/#/stc/id.nexus_id:9ko3mb04eo9nsyb1g6wp1by98

He sent this back to Lysenko to remove