this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
319 points (97.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2811 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

I'm kind of leaning towards the idea that the US government should offer secure IT services to campaigns, because this is a problem for the country, not just the people involved.

Like, a campaign alone probably cannot counter nation-state intelligence agencies acting against them.

And the problem is larger than just "a country might try to undermine someone's campaign".

Having damning material to blackmail a President would be a problem, even if the material comes from activity prior to time as a President. We do not want that.

EDIT: l'd also add that this isn't just a problem for the US. Leaders in general, but particularly leaders of democracies, where popularity determines who holds power, face that as a risk factor.

It's not an entirely new problem in the Internet era, but I think that the problems are tremendously exacerbated by having a lot of sensitive information living on very complicated machines connected to a globally-accessible network.

[–] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm of the opinion that the alleged billionaire with his own cryptocurrency and publicly traded tech company should be able to afford a security guy.

Why not just hire cyber ninjas?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 24 points 1 month ago

to be fair, though politicians are usually rich, we dont want a system wherein they have to be rich, or where compromising information on a high level politician gets to a hostile power just because while said politician was running they were a cheapskate about who they hired for security

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Why not just hire cyber ninjas?

Because they require payment upfront lmao

load more comments (12 replies)