this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
934 points (94.4% liked)
Atheist Memes
5577 readers
9 users here now
About
A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.
Rules
-
No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.
-
No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.
-
No bigotry.
-
Attack ideas not people.
-
Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.
-
No False Reporting
-
NSFW posts must be marked as such.
Resources
International Suicide Hotlines
Non Religious Organizations
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Ex-theist Communities
Other Similar Communities
!religiouscringe@midwest.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both groups had been involved with exploiting children. Percentage comprision of crime/population reflects both in bad lights.
I don't think this meme does what OP think it does
Gonna need some stats on that there, guy.
No of children abused by priests are shamefully large. But no of priest are too. So even if there are few cases of child molestation by drag cases, if you'll calculate on percentage itll look comparable. Both the scenarios will not yield more than 1 percent ( i am taking about higher side)
That's why I don't think that this meme is doing what OP think it does
The propaganda that’s been fed to you isn’t statistics.
He asked for a source and you gave your feewings. Do you see how ridiculous you sound? Of course you don't...
Sources
We
Want
Them
hypothetical stats are just as valid as real empirical data 🤡
Speak for yourself. I would rather leave my 7 years old with any drag queen artist rather than a priest alone in a church. Hell it's not even close. Just thinking about that makes my skin crawl
Hmm, would I rather leave a kid with a person from a group known for using their authority to rape children not to mention some of history's greatest atrocities or a fabulous dresser? That's a tough one.
Statistically your kids will be safe with both.
Liberal night feel safer with drag and conservative might feel safer with a priest.
Then give me the actual stats. Where are they?
The conservative would feel safer with a priest?
Is that why so many of my churchy friends have to warn each other about not being alone with specific people? Or leaving their children alone with certain individuals?
Meanwhile I'm still waiting for anyone to provide any evidence of a massive drag queen pedo conspiracy on the level of the the known abuse of the Catholic church, Boy Scouts, college athletics...
Typical incorrect rightie take.
I am not even in US to pick sides. I just follow news
Mate, left/right isn’t some unique American thing, it’s a spectrum of views you fall on.
Regurgitating whatever shit source of news gave you that information shows to me that you’re into that right wing sphere.
https://lemm.ee/comment/1791974
I justified my statement here. If no one knows w How percentage works then they should blame their education rather than anyone else
You don't show any stats or sources, you're the one who doesn't understand how stats work.
See this
https://lemmy.world/comment/1994737
it is funny how tribal people are these days. Not willing to even acknowledge baad actor on their side. People asking for source as no drag person ever got caught in child abuse related crime
No, we're asking for the statistics you claim to have. What studies did you get these stats from?
We’re not asking for justifications.
Justifications are hollow and useless.
We want evidence. Sources. You’re making claims and not offering a shred of anything tangible as evidence. It’s just one big “trust me bro” and we (or at least I) don’t do that.
they should blame their education
He said without a single hint of irony
Not very fucking well, clearly.
There's no drag queen church to protect them from their crimes and shuffle them around to another diocese so that they can continue hurting children. I would say that's the most glaring difference here.
¿Source?
Could you share your sources for this statement please?
Okay, cool, so where are your statistics?
You do realize that literally any "group" you care to create will, in fact, be "involved in exploiting children" if it's large enough and your definition of "exploiting" is disingenuous enough, right?
Of course you do. But you don't care. You just want those scary men in dresses to stop making you feel weird in your pants, don't you?
It's fine. Just go with it. Be one of the girls. Your god doesn't care, because your god doesn't exist.