17

While I'm never excited about these general uses, it seems like they did a reasonably good job with this experiment. Hopefully other Dept's don't just loosely 'throw it in'...

Some tidbits:

The AI operated on a fixed dataset. It did not collect information, nor did it tap into the main client record systems, so privacy risks were low.

It did not learn from the queries staff made or the information they used with it, and did not add that information to its learning banks, the reports said.

The two tests - first with 25 staff, then with 300 - found that along with boosts to service came gains in employee wellbeing, such as helping people with ADHD or poor hearing focus more in meetings, or those with dyslexia to revise content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So then what happens to the privacy aspect once they fully go live? They are saying that it was not invasive due to the sample being restricted, but if they go live, the private data will no longer be restricted.

[-] TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

Note the privacy risks were low, not no. So even this limited, safe trial has privacy risk which has been exposed to an AI processing & storing data where?

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
17 points (87.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1633 readers
11 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS