this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
526 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 123 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They should still have the debate. Empty podium and all.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even better, have a fact checker repeat a summarized version of Trump's previous answers to similar questions and then explain why it was a lie.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or have it cut to the empty podium for 2 seconds, before they say "oh yeah, Donald Trump was too tired to attend today, too tired, very tired candidate..."

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

Or say "Wow the crowd is going crazy for you Mr. Trump" followed by a shot of an empty row of seats

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

This is even better than saying he is a coward. We should be spamming social media, "low energy Donald too old for second debate."

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I vote that he's replaced with a slowly melting ice cube.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I vote that he is replaced with a robot that cracks eggs into a cold pan at a rate of 1 egg every 10 minutes.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Come on, we can't replace him with something more competent

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tub of lard. (All three things have replaced British politicians)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's just a tub.

[–] iroebfks@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They should ask the questions to both candidates, and just cut to an empty podium every time it's Trump's turn.

"Mr. President, you have one minute to respond to the Vice President's claims."

crickets

[–] el_doso@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would backfire with whoever is somehow still undecided, I fear

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

They could just play random sound bites of him talking about electrocuting sharks and windmills causing cancer. It would be pretty much like the last debate.