this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
303 points (97.8% liked)

Gaming

19947 readers
68 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Weird. They seemed fine with it when it launched.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The lawyers had time to figure out an angle.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's really funny to me how obvious the.. "inspiration" of this game is from pokemon, and yet nintendo has been struggling so hard to come up with something to sue them for, like i don't really care about this in and of itself, but seeing a big company unable to remove a splinter from their toe and copyright unable to be enforced brings me joy.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They want so hard to remove false competition, that is a glorious frustration.

Pokemon is Pokemon, Palworld is Palworld. One trying to claim the other steps on their toes is hilarious. If they have merit, Doom could sue every FPS with monsters.

Stay mad Nintendo/GameFreak, you are a joke and should make better games.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

They are working on a new Legends game, which is somewhat similar in gameplay.

Could be that they'd rather not have any association made.