this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
397 points (97.4% liked)

News

23266 readers
4715 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance has suggested that American support for NATO should be predicated on the European Union not regulating Elon Musk and his X social media platform, formerly known as Twitter.

The Republican vice presidential nominee and Ohio senator claimed in an interview with YouTuber Shawn Ryan that a top EU official had threatened to arrest the billionaire if he allowed former President Donald Trump back on X.

“The leader, I forget exactly which official it was within the European Union, but sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, ‘We’re going to arrest you if you platform Donald Trump,’ who, by the way, is the likely next president of the United States,” Vance said in the interview published last week.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So what America should be saying is, if NATO wants us to continue supporting them and NATO wants us to continue to be a good participant in this military alliance, why don’t you respect American values and respect free speech?

JD, buddy, what you don't understand is that Europe's free speech is far more free than the US.

Americans have a tendency to think they have everything and everyone else has nothing. Until we go somewhere else and discover it's the other way around.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

JD: But Germany banned the Nazi symbol! One of the few free speech things I care about!

[–] tissek@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Europe's free speech is far more free than the US

But not Europes FREEZEPEACH(tm)! And freezepeach is all that matters

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Its a race to the bottom as the police and surveillance states of the entire NATO block fill to bursting.

Vance is bitching because an American company got on the wrong side of the European security state today. Tomorrow, he'll be clamoring to shut down the BBC or to censor some German metal band for being critical of his Dear Leader.

[–] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Americans have a tendency to think they have everything and everyone else has nothing. Until we go somewhere else and discover it's the other way around.

Obviously healthcare and education are things they are pretty much guaranteed that we don't have. They have better worker protections. I mean I'm not against gun rights, but what we have in the States is an embarrassment. I'm sure there are several other issues that I'm not thinking of right now or don't know about, but I didn't know we had worse free speech than Europe.

What makes Europe free speech more free than ours?

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes the US have more free speech?

Legally all EU countries have freedom of expression enshrined in their constitutions.

Culturally I find Americans blind to any non governmental censorship. Since it's legal its OK.I believe not allowing private companies to censor people is absurdly considered a violation of free speech.

There are obvious results as well: the US is way less politically diverse.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's true. Ancaps love to talk how almost anything government-done can be done by private entities in the right conditions and social consensus. Turns out this is true for censorship too.

I'm completely ideology-agnostic at this point. Whatever works, works. Nothing around seems to work though.

In any case, while this is true, power goes the shortest way and power corrupts. USA is the hegemon of our world and the center of our civilization, which is now united by American English language and American technologies, and what's the worst, American corporations. Much more power goes its way to corrupt it.

You know how bad people like to grease in shit the right tools for fixing the problem, preventively? That Putinist thing about "multi-polar" world means that they want to be a little hegemon too, and to have free reign in gray zones. But there is a similar sane point.

But really decentralization of tech research and production and standards is something we all need else we vanish. Right now we have one big Internet with one set of protocols, a handful of very complex software stacks everybody uses, and this situation should already be called a centralized one. Due to network effects and other, mostly with fake argument, kinds of pressure it doesn't make sense for most people to use parallel systems.

A de-facto conglomerate of companies, social groups, interests and ideas can be a monopolist too.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I'm not who you asked, but I often think of supression tactics against forms of free speech used in the US that some countries in the EU do less. Not all of them (UK online speech policing and arrests as a counterexample), but voter supression, union busting, and law enforcement response to protests have been handled in various countries in ways I consider more free for the citizens.

TLDR: Intimidation tactics and biased response happens less in other countries.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

What makes Europe free speech more free than ours?

The gist: While free speech is a constitutional right in both the US and most European countries, free speech is now controlled to a large degree by social media companies in the US.

Here's a good, short recap of a longer study on the subject from a US scholar: https://news.ku.edu/news/article/2020/01/11/study-analyzes-american-other-free-speech-traditions-suggests-inevitable-clashes