this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
920 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
6604 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago (8 children)

We need to slowdown YouTube and get an alternative that is viable for people and creators. The problem in this case is creators and brands, almost no creators would continue doing videos if there's no money at the end

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 22 points 1 month ago

The problem with money being involved is it's an invitation to spam crap everywhere.

One of my relatives has recently taken up "AI travel videos" and "AI cute videos" as a "hobby". No doubt based on the first thing that came up when I searched for those things, a video titled "make $10,000 a month spamming up YouTube with your AI slop".

Oh, and it needs you to buy the AI slop generating tools that they happen to sell. How convenient!

I mean, this also happened with broadcast TV, where we suddenly went from like 4 channels filled with programs and things competing for space, to 200 channels, where the rush was on to fill the gaps between the adverts as cheaply as possible with reality show tat. And that's all YouTube is now.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The other problem is storage and bandwidth.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The solution is decentralization of the web

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So now the problem is sharing your IP with every member of the P2P swarm.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Not really because sharing an IP is nothing that important

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Not if it used Veiled

[–] Teils13@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is the PeerTube network, which works like Lemmy.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is one the best YouTube alternative but needs to be adopt massively

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 month ago

Start using it and ask content creators to also put their content on there.

[–] sentientity@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

It's subscription based, but Nebula is creator owned I believe. Sucks though that everything free gets acquired by some extractive company.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Something community owned and a non-profit would be good.

[–] gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

They're already halfway there /s

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Right, but again the problem is creators

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We probably need to have some kind of business that links up people looking for ads with in video monetization. Of course sponsor block Will negate that to some decent extent.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Teils13@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 month ago

VK Video is indeed probably close to it, being a quasi state company. Theoretically they can not maximize profit extraction in all spaces, and keep the videos without unlimited propaganda. But Rutube is a profit-seeking company that is just smaller scale youtube. Let's see how the 1st will evolve over time.