63
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Didn't mean to be a dick sorry! I get where you're coming from now, eliminating all cars, my thought was just even if none of the commercial use changes you can get rid of like half the lanes easy. rail freight, underground rail, cargo bikes, etc. would all be great to expand too though to get rid of the rest

[-] bortsampson@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's all good. I have zero issue with reducing the traffic in the city. They are incredibly dangerous within cities. It's just really hard in skyscremovedr dense neighborhoods to eliminate adhoc services without providing some kind of replacement beforehand. I don't understand the rationale of driving a car into Manhattan if you can avoid it. They already have plenty of public transit. I haven't lived in Manhattan for 20 years and NYC for 10 so I don't know how bad it is now. But like, it can't be that bad.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

issue everyone in manhattan a flying pigeon and call it good mao-wave

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13468 readers
785 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS