this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22055 readers
147 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I can see this being annoying to streamers, it seems like a net positive overall. I'd be interested to hear the perspective of someone who's vehemently against this, to help me understand why.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would this be annoying to streamers? Honest question, I'm not a Twitch user.

Would it be the softcore porn "gamer girls" being called out separately from eg. horror games?

There is a difference between gamer girls playing horror games and professional models licking audio testing equipment for hours on end.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

The article points out that the threshold to require each of the new labels is a bit nebulous, and that they're allowing a 30 day grace period for them to test the waters and find out where the line is drawn... while the safer path is probably just to err on the side of tagging it if you're unsure, I'm sure some advertisers wouldn't want to be associated with some labels, so they probably would rather toe the line than step across it. (I'm not a streamer, though, so I'm just guessing.)

[–] Johnnypneumoniac@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

My guess is that people who are against it are expecting to make less money because advertisers will be able to say they don't want to be on streams that are labeled "x".