this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
1044 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

In short, the Administrative Procedure Act. It sets out the procedures that have to be followed before policy decisions get made. If the FCC doesn't follow the APA's procedures exactly, that gives the industry grounds to sue. Even if the industry eventually looses, it would still mean a stay on the new policies during which they would continue to exploit consumers.

The APA isn't a bad thing, since it forces federal agencies to be deliberate in making policy decisions that could have far reaching consequences. That said, it does make the government even slower to react to situations that often change quickly. But it has tripped up this administration and previous administrations when they have tried to make hasty decisions, including Trump with his "Muslim ban".

[–] slicedcheesegremlin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Question, what the fuck was the "Muslim ban" I've never heard of this.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13769

It was never law, which is why it was so easily reversed.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this where the last Net Neutrality request for comments window failed miserably? Like, the FCC did the process, but they let it be provably sabotaged by the industry and went ahead anyways...

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Part of the reason they "went ahead anyways" was painfully obviously because of the FCC chair at the time, Ajit Pai, who had previously been Associate General Counsel at Verizon. They even made a "comedy" video of him being asked to be a toady by Verizon.

This is because in the US, for it to be considered bribery or quid-pro-quo, you basically have to write a check and in the notes section put "This is a Bribe" otherwise it's just considered "business" and it's totally okay for you to make "comedy" videos mocking the people wanting an end to corruption.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wish informative answers like yours would get the upvotes they deserve. You have my upvote.

EDIT: Okay yeah, several hours later now it's heavily upvoted. Thanks Lemmings, for giving me faith in comments sections again.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! And it is getting upvotes, with you being the first. After all, I only wrote it a few minutes ago.

I'm not scrubbing my account on Reddit partially because some of the comments are like the one above. Sure, much of what I wrote is of limited value. But if there is a historian going back through Internet history and using a language processing model to analyze comments, I think my voice is worth leaving there.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, I've been very ambivalent about the idea of everyone deleting all their histories to hurt reddit.

Sure, it hurts reddit in the short-term, but in the long-term it is hurting overall internet history.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I don't think it does much of anything to Reddit, short or long term. It does far more to destroy Internet history.

[–] Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't there still a vacancy on the FCC? Wouldn't that also affect any new designations?

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, there is. At present, most actions that are taken by the board are consensus actions that won't hit a Democrat-Republican deadlock. Once a chairperson is confirmed, they can start tackling the more contentious stuff that will have 3-2 decisions. Biden's previous nominee was scuttled after some attention to some mildly spicy tweets that were critical of Fox. He nominated a replacement a month ago and her nomination will likely go smoother.