this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
96 points (100.0% liked)

games

20524 readers
9 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

soypoint-1 dumpster-fire soypoint-2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair here, your post was about 95% indistinguishable to the group of people that went around in late 2013 to early 2014 that MWO was a "dead game". I've been playing MWO since closed beta, and was pretty active in the community then (and still am now), so I remember a lot of the major stuff that happened back then and throughout the years. Like there's a lot I can give shit towards PGI, but at the end of the day I can't be too hard on the people that finally told Harmony Gold to legally fuck off.

I never saw it as a dead game even after I played it. I can tell that the apparent similarity set you off enough to call me an ass and so on, but again, I am willing to accept I had heard incorrectly (and possibly heard from the doomposters you mentioned) but either way I only lurked those forums and only occasionally to begin with.

I can't be too hard on the people that finally told Harmony Gold to legally fuck off.

It's too bad I'm not likely to ever get to fly a Phoenix Hawk LAM outside of the Advanced BattleTech fan mod because of the lingering meat hooks that Harmony Gold has in the IP, that have long made LAMs themselves just about a forbidden concept.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

that have long made LAMs themselves just about a forbidden concept.

Right now given that HG doesn't have any real grounds to come after BT ever again, the only thing that is keeping LAMs from being messed with right now per the current BT line developer is the aerospace rules themselves, like he wants to completely redo them as they are uniquely dogshit for a lot of reasons.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they are uniquely dogshit for a lot of reasons.

The established centuries of lore made them dogshit, for sure, but considering their origins as Macross veritech where they were awesome there, I'd love to see them made good.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

LAMs themselves are really good units, but they cost so much BV that you can get the same thing by just taking a bunch of fast hovertanks or a bunch of 7/11/7 mechs. The thing is right now CGL doesn't really want to do anything with LAMs until they go and redo the aerospace rules, which the aerospace rules themselves are really bad, sorta...

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

LAMs are brutal for back-shotting everything in BattleTech Advanced. Ton for ton, a bunch of medium LAMs can utterly obliterate units twice their size and quickly, but if one of them loses their evasion counters for any number of reasons, it's smoked pretty much instantly. High risk, high reward.