Funny: Home of the Haha

5698 readers

1432 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp@lemmy.world

489

It's time for a change (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It can be both, warm lights don't massively affect how cold/warm something is compared to other objects

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The light is clearly a cold light, and the reflection magnifies that effect. The sample is much less reflective.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm no expert but, wouldn't this be the sheen/finish of the paint itself?

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that, due to the placement of the camera, we are not getting a fully accurate comparison. Need more neutral lighting for that.