396
Copyright and why it's broken. - Tom Scott
(www.youtube.com)
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I'm not entirely sure that it must have "read" her book in order to produce the content that she claims that it must have.
For example - you can read wikipedia, Goodreads, NYT theater review, NPR musical review, Guardian review... and many other reviews and discussions of the book or stage performance to get a sufficient understanding of its contents without ever having had access to the text of the original book.
Just as my old English teacher would note that reading the cliff notes was not reading the assigned text, so too reading reviews and summaries isn't reading the original text.