this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
1438 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

28380 readers
1027 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"As the social media landscape ebbs and flows, the team at BBC Research & Development are researching social technologies and exploring possibilities for the BBC. One part of our work is to establish a BBC presence in the distributed collection of social networks known as the Fediverse, a collection of social media applications all linked together by common protocols. The most common software used in this area is Mastodon, a Twitter-like social networking service with around 2 million active monthly users. We are now running an experimental BBC Mastodon server at https://social.bbc where you can follow some of the BBC’s social media accounts, including BBC R&D, Radio 4 and 5 Live. We hope to be able to add more accounts from other areas of the BBC at some point."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] simple@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

It's interesting that they decided to make their own server and not just join a popular instances like Mastodon Social. I know part of it is then experimenting but if the goal is to just have a presence in the Fediverse, it sounds like a lot of effort for little reason.

[–] joe@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's interesting you have this opinion; I figured this would be the biggest draw for corporations-- they're no longer beholden to some third party for their media presence-- it's all hosted and controlled by themselves;.

In email terms, it's the difference between tide@gmail.com and tide@tide.com.

Edit: I don't have any idea why I went with tide, so if you find yourself wondering why I did that, get in line. haha

[–] breakfastmtn@geddit.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It also solves the verification problem. It's without a doubt the best way to go for an organization - especially news orgs.

[–] Kushi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, but to be honest there's already a pretty good verification system on Mastodon, even if you don't host your own instance.

[–] breakfastmtn@geddit.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes and no. And verifying by domain is better, especially for people who are likely to be impersonated (ex. Journalists).

Rel="me" doesn't actually verify a user's identity, it verifies that a user has a relationship with a website. The problem is that you need to leave Mastodon to make sure that the website actually verifies their identity. I've verified a connection between a Mastodon and Pixelfed account, for example, but it doesn't tell you anything about who I am. It's also much easier to spoof a website than it is to get the BBC to give you an account on their private instance.

It really works great the other way though! If you have a known identity here, you can be sure that the linked sites are legit.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 year ago

I would give you all the uploads if I could. This 1,000%

[–] jocanib@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

It's instant verification for all their accounts and an instance that won't disappear on them.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

You may as well say the same thing about having their own website vs using Facebook.

This kind of thing is exactly the point of the Fediverse. They control and own their content, they control who gets to post from their URL.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Treat it like email. Thats how Mastodon will grow

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No, this is what they should be doing. It's the difference between owning your house and renting. They get to make the rules on their instance, they're not at the mercy of a tech bro company or a trash billionaire that might have a political agenda against actual journalism...

After what happened to the BBC and NPR on Twitter, who can blame them for saying "Fine, we'll do it ourselves!"

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I guess with twitter they learned the lesson of being beholden to a rogue CEO/admin who can take away verified status or change the rules on a whim. It is better that they maintain their own official presence that they control.

[–] urda@lebowski.social 6 points 1 year ago

You’ve missed the entire point of Federation then.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Could be that BBC employees can have their own accounts on mastodon going forward

[–] whataboutshutup 1 points 1 year ago

They can purge content harming their brand and ban bad actors instance-wide. No corpo would sign for less.