this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
375 points (97.7% liked)

YUROP

1212 readers
1 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
375
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by 7eter@feddit.org to c/yurop@lemm.ee
 

We need taxes for all - also the super-rich.

"Tax the rich" is an official EU petition. The EU Parliament has to deal with it when successful.

7 EU countries must reach the quorum. And in total 1M Votes are needed. Check yours in the chart and share, cross post etc.!

The petition calls for the introduction of a wealth tax on very large fortunes. Sign the petition here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7eter@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This just qualifies as ultra-rich - which is not wrong, imho. I don't know the exact conditions for Belgium but in Germany the taxes would start to show effect at 4,6 million with 2%. If you think about it assets in this magnitude could easily lead to 1000€ daily passive income. Those 2% wont hurt.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But it doesn’t include the home or business assets. So you could have one guy with €1.25 million in stocks who lives off a modest income from dividends and sleeps in an RV and he would be classified as ultra rich.

Another guy could live in a €2 million mansion and be the owner of a €100 million business (but have no other investments) and be classified as NOT ultra rich. See the problem?

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the problem is you're shooting down a great initiative with an edge cases that affects maybe a couple dozen RV sleeping millionaires. Maybe he should participate and contribute to society!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Edge cases are what these guys used to get their fortunes in the first place. The more common term for these is tax loopholes! Everyone knows that big corporations like Apple use them (“Double Irish” being the most infamous) but individuals use them all the time.

Anyway, the point I’m making is that I really don’t care about the RV sleeping millionaire, I care about taxing the 200 millionaire business owner I mentioned who would currently be exempt. Because of the loophole, you can bet that all of the “ultra-rich” are going to restructure their investments into a single business they own so that they can completely exempt themselves from the tax.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, start with this law then close loopholes. It's like you're climbing a cliff, you don't leap straight to the top you get handholds where you can find them and make your way up.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why should someone be able to live off dividends if they have “ultra-rich” wealth at the bank? This person has a lot of money so if they live in an RV it’s obviously a choice they made.

Plus they could just spend some of that stock money and go below “ultra rich” level and get taxed less. And perhaps then they have to use part of their non-ultra-rich wealth to live their RV dream life to supplement their dividends. Doesn’t sound too bad.

TLDR; I don’t feel bad for someone that can’t live dividends when hey have more than one million euro in the bank.

Edit: while is still stand by comment, I do see I missed your point about fairness. Not too big of a problem in my mind. Or perhaps a solution would be to tax home values above X amount? (Edit2: and only the amount above X)