this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
287 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

48726 readers
943 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The codenames for every major Debian release are named after characters from Pixar's Toy Story franchise. Debian's unstable release is fittingly named after Sid, an unstable character from the Toy Story movies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Zen_Cow_Says_Mu@infosec.pub 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

unfortunately there's no rhyme or reason to the naming. which came first: bookworm, buster, or bullseye? They should just use numbers.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Still better than Ubuntu's Horny Herring naming scheme.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But to its credit its alphabetical

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 5 points 4 months ago

And memorable!

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

And has been for so long, they already went through it once

I actually like Mint's naming scheme, of alphabetical women's names that end in an a sound. Only one problem: They decided to go with the minor upgrade cycle during Mint 17. The 17th letter is Q. I'm frankly surprised they were even able to think of "Quiana." That's why the rest of the 17s were R names, Rafaela, Rebecca etc. so now they're off by one.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not in the apt sources list they don't. It's very annoying.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You can use version numbers, but it's on you to change them when new point releases drop.

https://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian12.6/

[–] delirious_owl 2 points 4 months ago

Why cant I just use /Debian12/ ?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It should be the default. The silly names should just be for marketing and used for nothing that matters.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Yes, that is my complaint, thanks.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago

Yeah, they should have used the names in alphabetical order, like Ubuntu with their codenames.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Numbers give the wrong impression that one version follows another. Debian release channels exit alongside each other individually. Giving the release channels names helps to make that distinction. It also makes for an easy layout of packages in APT repositories.

Sid is and always has been Sid. If you were to assign numbers, what number should replace that name? There are perfectly working labels for release channels and there is no reasonable replacement.