this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22058 readers
17 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reminder that the animals people eat are also living and feeling beings who don't want to die for your burger.
While you are correct, this is taking away from the outrage about the hurt animals mentioned in this post.
Its rarely like: poor animals I've been eating all my life, I'll be vegan now.
It's more often like: good point, I shouldn't care about these animals neither.
You, hearing that someone is torturing monkeys: "ah yes that reminds me I should torture some monkeys"
???
I would still rather be killed and eaten than slowly tortured for weeks by someone making money off torture videos.
Neither needs to happen
A lot of things that happen in this world don't need to happen.
Wouldn't you rather just live and not be tortured?
I mean if we are going down that road I would like human rights for all humans not just myself, animal welfare rights for all animals, and for the world's ecosystems to not be ecocided by climate change. But it has limited relevance to the discussion..
It just frustrates me a little when discussion of a specific issue gets immediately derailed into discussion of another related issue.
Even now youtube has a ton of torture-adjacent videos about hurt or distressed baby monkeys, catering to the same group that the torture rings cater to.
Immediately ignoring that in favour of the usual vegan talking points feels suboptimal, to me. There's nothing actually wrong with paying specific attention to specific subjects sometimes.
I totally agree.
While there is an argument that eating meat is bad, we are talking about literally torturing animals without any purpose other than entertainment. This is a different level of awful.
Put it in a discussion community, ask them, try to brainstorm a new normal. This is news, of course people won't be very open to listen to ancillary discussion topics.
It's apparently always the wrong time to bring up what happens to "food" animals.
When it's on post about animal cruelty we're derailing and taking away from the specific case.
When it's on any other post it's irrelevant and preachy.
So when should we speak up for the billions of animals getting needlessly abused and killed?
I don't personally have a problem with vegans making points about vegan ethical beliefs in general. It's just the derailing away and equivalence fallacy I dislike - ironically I think it trivialises both issues.
Any post about it outside vegan communities gets downvoted to hell.
I'm glad you don't personally have a problem with people against animal cruelty.
Reminding people that they are paying for horrific animal abuse doesn't take away from other cases of abuse.
Not sure how it looks from your instance, but I now have to scroll down past at least 21 comments of the usual omnivore/vegan debates before I can find a comment that's actually about OP's article on macaque torture rings.
It kind of reminds me of how over on reddit any mention of violence against women in the big subs would get drowned in a tide of comments about violence against men.
If it had been part of a contextualised conversation it would have been different.
So maybe take the hint
No, I won't stop speaking up against billions of animals getting needlessly abused and killed just because the abusers don't wanna hear it.
Right, just don't keep being surprised 'kts always the wrong time to bring it up'
And 'im always down voted outside of our communities'
If you refuse to learn when it's appropriate to talk about it, you're going to be ostracized.
I can care deeply about how many kids are sexually abused by priests, but if I bring it every time I see someone I know, Im a creepy fucking individual. If someone's talking about sexual abuse, it might be the time to mention it, it might not. If someone's talking about how THEY were sexually abused, and I rant about how many kids are abused by priests, I'm an insensitive fucking individual.
You're bringing up an extremely common and accepted practice of farmed meat, that THE MAJORITY of people take part of. If you conflate that with a specific news story of a literal Nazi torturing an animal for the sexual thrill or whatever, you're crossing so many fucking layers of acceptability, you just sound like an extremist. Which diminishes your point, the point of the article, and the perception of the communities you represent.
Have some fucking tact. And a little self awareness.
The majority of people participating in something horrible is exactly why we need to speak up against it every opportunity...
BILLIONS of animals are getting needlessly abused and killed, don't you think that's a bit more important than 'tact'?
If your lack of tact prevents people from listening to you then fucking YES ABSOLUTELY
Look, most people aren't buying meat to fantasize about the murder of animals like youre implying. The fact you're saying that, weither you intended to or not, is putting the people you're trying to convince on the other side of an us vs them. That's not productive and youre just fucking annoying.
Most people buy meat because it's cheap. Its cheaper than plants because the meat industry is subsidized by the government. Its subsidized by the government because it's the easiest way to get reasonably balanced nutrition to the most amount of people.
If you really want less people eating meat, target those aspects.Not the end user trying to feed their family.
If you want real change, and aren't just trying to pick fights on the internet, wouldn't you rather be affective instead of just fucking annoying everyone, where it's always the wrong time, where youre downvoted everywhere outside of your life minded communities?
Seriously it's a different fight but read up on Daryl Davis. He's a black guy who gets people to leave the KKK. Do you think him picking fights with them would help? Trying to argue how stupid and hateful it is for them to hate black people? Pinning them in an us vs them?
He gets them to leave by befriending them. Showing them theres another way WITHOUT FORCING THEIR HAND OR CONVINCING THEM THEYRE SHITE FOR THE WAY THEY WERE RAISED. that's literally the least productive thing you can be doing.
I'm not implying or saying that people buy meat because they want to be cruel, but that doesn't change the fact that it is cruel.
A plant based diet should be cheaper for most people, vegetables, rice and beans aren't expensive, meat is.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-11-11-sustainable-eating-cheaper-and-healthier-oxford-study
It's incredibly easy to get reasonably balanced nutrition with a plant based diet, eat varied and take B12, done.
I'm not trying to pick fights, I'm just informing people, you picking a fight with me isn't my fault.
Dude you know damn well that even if I go "uwu, please consider not eating meat once a week :3" I'd still get destroyed, it's not about tone, people just don't like hearing it, which, again, isn't a good reason to stop talking about it.
I'm not forcing anything on anyone or convincing people they are shit, my original comment just reminded people that the animals they ate also are living beings.
You're not intending to say people buy meat to be cruel. You absolutely definitely said it.
Look fried, I have no skin in this fight. I was trying to help you but if I'm just wasting my breath I'll move on.
People aren't dismissing you because you're talking about veganism. They're dismissing you because you're an ineffective communicator. I'm not discussing that with you I'm trying to help you sway more people to your cause. Its not my cause so I don't personally give a fuck.
If you feel getting nutrition through plant based meals is easy, good. Focus on that. Most people don't, that's an easier point to sway people than convincing them the way they and their parent and their grandparents and their parents grandparents were cruel heartless humans torturing animals for fun. The video you started this conversation in is about a Nazi torturing an animal for fun. You equated that to everyone eating meat. Now I'm against you. You aren't going to convince me to join your cause that way.
In a way that makes you in the in group and people outside of it against you.
Because that's also ineffective communication. Convince people why they'd want to be vegan, not why you want them to be vegan.
If you feel its cheaper to eat a plant based diet, good. Focus on that. Most people don't. I definitely don't. How much is a gallon of plant based milk? How much is cow milk? I'm not genuinely asking you cow milk is significantly cheaper. at least in my area you might be in fucking Albania or something im not familiar with. I doubt it. Its a significantly harder life to be vegan and poor.
Either way I feel my effort is falling on deaf ears so l8r sk8er I got better shit to do.
Plants let out an ultrasonic scream when their leaves are cut or they don't get enough water
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/plants-shriek-with-high-pitched-ultrasonic-clicks-when-stressed-study-2023-3%3famp
Most farmed plants are used as animal feed, eating plants directly uses much less.
So even if this nonsense argument had any validity veganism would still be the answer.
You choose to ignore the screams that your ears cant decipher.
What? I just told you that less plants are "harmed" for a planet based diet than a meat filled one.
I wonder what all the people downvoting think, do they disagree that "food" animals are also living beings?
They think this isn't the time or place to bring that up. ffs have some tact. Or self awareness at least
It's apparently always the wrong time to bring up what happens to "food" animals.
When it's on post about animal cruelty we're derailing and taking away from the specific case.
When it's on any other post it's irrelevant and preachy.
So when should we speak up for the billions of animals getting needlessly abused and killed?