this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Unixporn

15400 readers
50 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
18
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mrh@mander.xyz to c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrh@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I have never used nix or nixos. I liked their shared idea (functional, atomic, reproducible systems), and so when I looked at their differences they seemed to all be pros for guix:

  1. Clearer, more robust, more centralized documentation
  2. GNU Project
  3. Guile Scheme (Lisp) as opposed to Nix DSL
  4. Unparalleled emacs integration

The only bittersweet aspect of guix compared to nix was the foss only stuff, as I do need some proprietary drivers, but nonguix is so easy it hasn't been a practical issue. And of course I am big advocate of free software so I like that guix is pushing that forward.

There's also a theoretical issue that guix has less packages, but the standard channel + nonguix has had everyhing I use.