this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
66 points (95.8% liked)

Games

16742 readers
679 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Moonguide@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Been eyeing this with my mates but haven't copped due to price. Are performance issues as bad as recent releases?

[–] ydant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been running great for me (3080), but I left everything on default. The only issue we've had is the game has crashed for one of our party about 4 times when going through doors. It's saved progress all but one of those crashes.

Overall, it feels like Remnant 1.5 - same generally loop and just a bit more polished. But that's great. It's exactly what I wanted.

[–] Moonguide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm just a bit worried my 2070 will choke a little in the more demanding areas. I've seen it can get quite chaotic and that's when it gets worse.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The game isn't as bad as, say, Jedi: Survivor, but the overall performance isn't great.

It's designed to be run with up scaling on, which is a shame.

Either way, amazing game.

[–] Moonguide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, shame. Think I'll wait on performance patches. I got no problems running it but I'd rather not buy something not up to basic specs.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just made a post yesterday promising performance patches, but I think it's important to understand the issues I mentioned won't be fixed.

Frame drops and stuttering? Sure, they can fix that.

Designing your rendering system and performance targets around the use of DLSS/FSR? That won't change. Blame the PS5 and new Xbox for that. A lot of AAA games are going to be like that for a while.

[–] Moonguide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm aware of the latter. Wish studios would stop using advancements in tech to cover up deficiencies in optimization.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 1 year ago

It's not that simple. Games are bigger and more complex than ever, and studios/publishers/VCs are pushing devs to release earlier and earlier.

As long as the majority of players see it as acceptable (which, sadly, is true), developers will utilize whatever they can to deliver on time.

Note: Even though I'm making points to the contrary, know that I'm on your side. I dislike FSR and DLSS. (at least in any profile beneath Balanced)