this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1369 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

5171 readers
858 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1369
Elon (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

there’s many reasons to want to become a multi-planetary species

Yes but it's a fantasy. The scenario where mars would be truly independant of earth is basically impossible without the far more likely reality:

If we survive that long, we won't be squishy humans anymore. Uploaded, AI, genetically engineered biotech, take your pick, but shuttling regular humans around this century just doesn't make sense.

[–] Balex@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Going to the moon was a fantasy at one point. I just don't see any downsides to trying to become multi-planetary. Even if it fails there would still be technology developed in pursuit of that goal that helps life on earth.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There is a big difference between a scientific mission and a self sustaining presence.

The later is still so far off that, as was said, other technological "paths" are decades, if not centuries, closer. If we survive on Earth that long.

What I am getting at is that viewing Mars colonization as a means to preserve human life is absolutely nuts. It's literally impossible in a reasonable timeframe, even with speculative technology/engineering, without changing humanity to the point that the whole fantasy changes anyway.