this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
317 points (97.9% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics

3115 readers
1 users here now

A community for Dungeons and Dragons Memes and Comics

/c/DnD Network Communities

Rules (Subject to Change)

"Title" - [Comic Name]

e.g. "Krak of Dawn" - [Swords Comic]

*Does not apply to memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
Devil_Master@lemmy.world
317
Nope, nada, nothing in between... (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by eleefece@lemmy.world to c/dnd_memes@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The way they told me is that every class of 4th edition effectively had 2 builds.

Every level had 2 choices: one that fit your build and one that didn't.

Choosing any option that wasn't on the build was useless.

Then there is also something about cooldown abilities, which is hard to keep track of on boardgames.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except cooldowns were extremely straightforward? You had at-will abilities (use as often as you want), encounter abilities (once per fight), and daily abilities (once per day). Easier than tracking spell slots.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like Baldur's Gate 3 in a way

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It felt like they were trying to make an MMO be a table-top game at the time when WoW was at the height of its popularity (that WotLK nostalgia). Its not that it was overly bad, it was a square peg, round hole situation.

These days I feel like 5E has no teeth, very good intro but beyond the first few campaigns and the endless art books its mechanically uninteresting. Pathfinder 2e has been what most of my games have converted to.

[–] Dakkaface@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have heard the '4e was MMO edition' critique multiple times and not once has anyone been able to articulate why 4e was specifically like WoW in a way that wasn't outright false or was so broadly similar that it applied to nearly all fantasy RPGs, electronic or tabletop.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Painting in broad strokes here as its been over a decade since D&D v4 and WoWs high-water mark, I think people call it that because of several factors, not all of them in the game design of v4.

  • It was the begining of the trends that we see today in 5e where the stock classes were designed to fit the archtype, not the style. If you played something out of the base books, it just had to work and character progression was boiled down, you had to try to brick your character.
  • This was also around the time when WoW was changing its mentality to "bring the player, not the class". This still holds up today where they design content around the players being there, not what was there. Fewer class specific shortcuts or tricks, unique traits. No one single common ability is unique to a class. For example, need temporary invuln to eat one hit that causes max damage, bring a pally, mage, or hunters.
  • The migration from 3.5 to 4 left a void in class/race variety as the prestige classes took a while to convert to the new system, many were lost. Like when Disney bought Starwars and threw all the extended universe content out. D&D 3.5 had an alarmingly high number of suplimental books.
  • The increase in charts in v4 felt like they could have fit more in with a PC RPG, I do realize the irony in the success of Pathfinder 1 as it just took that "charts for days" concept and ran with it.

D&D v4 to me will always be the MMO version because it was a product of its time, and also WotC scrapped pretty quickly, relativly speaking.