this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
444 points (97.2% liked)

News

23300 readers
4611 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The group, Global Alliance for Responsible Media, also known as GARM, is a voluntary ad-industry initiative run by the World Federation of Advertisers that aims to help brands avoid having their advertisements appear alongside illegal or harmful content. GARM confirmed it is still planning to defend itself in court.

The end of GARM marks a temporary victory for Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino, even though a judge hasn’t made a ruling yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No shit, non-profit? It's a consortium of the world's largest advertisers. You can hate Musk, and hate them at the same time. I would go so far as to say that's the only reasonable view on the matter.

[–] sar1n@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago

Yep my thoughts exactly

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The org's mission was to tell advertisers when they're advertising next to hate crimes. You really don't want advertisers to make money from ads next to hate crimes, because that incentivizes people posting nazi shit on social media. And this org would prevent that. It's not a bad thing.

Its disappearance won't really matter much because it's a paper fiction anyway, and there'll be another one.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

And Musk has even managed to do a couple of worthwhile things in his life as well. I don't see why that means I should disregard every other terrible thing he has done, and will do.

Because that is your argument. That these gigantic advertising entities, who would destroy the world if it meant an extra 0.5% in their net revenue, are doing the world of service and we should be grateful for it.

I am not, fuck them. I hope all their key decision makers and Musk gather for settlement talks, and a meteor strikes square in the middle of the conference table.

[–] klugerama@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Ok, fuck them. But shutting down this nonprofit organization doesn't directly affect their bottom line. It may eventually have an indirect effect.

My point is that by shutting down, the only obvious direct effect is that advertisements are now more likely to appear adjacent to bullshit hate propaganda. This doesn't substantially hurt the advertisers in a large way - it hurts people more because it elevates the visibility of hate speech. Why would you think that's good? This does absolutely fuck all to stop advertising or advertisers.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, you don't understand.

The advertising entities, who definitely suck ass, would be MUCH WORSE and so would EVERYTHING ELSE if there wasn't someone telling them "don't put ads next to nazis". It's called harm reduction dude.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, I understand.

Do you really think that if it wasn't for their consortium, companies would think "you know what? I think we should run ads next to Nazis".

Hint: No. They wouldn't.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

So let me get this straight: you hate ad companies and want to cast them all into the fire (a position I agree with, fwiw);

but you also think they are ethical enough and competent enough to self-police running against nazi shit.

What

[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But they would end up running ads next to them more often. There are a lot of shitty industry groups. This is like the most banal, inoffensive one to get shitty about.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I really think you're missing the point here.

CNN is running a headline intentionally distorting the reality of what this group is. They're making it sound like Musk destroyed the Humane Society.

They want people to feel pity for the world's largest advertisers, or feel angry that Musk managed to slightly inconvenience them.

If you want to have a debate on the merits, you can't have it in an environment like that.