this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
976 points (92.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

29728 readers
697 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you ask me, I'm upset no one picked up that this consideration was sexist and racist, although it is indeed the best choice for her to win, which reflects how bad US can't get over race and gender.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago (4 children)

All VPs are basically picked because of what they are more than who they are. Since there aren’t a lot of actual duties assigned by the constitution, VPs are just picked to help win the election. That means their age, gender, skin color, birthplace, etc are more important than their achievements. That means almost all VPs, including Vance, are “DEI hires.”

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd argue Walz bucks this trend, at least to a certain degree. His progressive policy and seemingly unwavering integrity seems to be a huge reason he was picked. They've leaned into his achievements and republicans are desperately grasping at straws trying to criticize him.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, I kinda wish Walz was the candidate instead, based on his progressivism and integrity.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

8 years of Harris and then 8 years of Walz.

16 years isn't much in the grand scheme but maybe in that time The Left can wake up and mobilize and actually make some progress towards election reforms so we can start un-fucking the last 50 years of GOP-Heritage Foundation Trickledown Reaganomics Bullshit that's destroying the country.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Walz Ocasio-Cortez 2032?

im honestly not sure, with kamala as the previous VP she has a lot more experience than walz, so it provides a much stronger campaign being the "previous VP" walz being VP also gets him a large in to being a presidential candidate later on, assuming people want another 70-80 year old dude running the country.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Completely agree. He also just seems like a better candidate vibe wise so far, he's funny and endearing in a way Kamala is not. Although I do vibe with Kamala's dorky/weird moments that so many seem to criticize.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It's still about perception over tangible benefits, though. He's not chosen because he'll make progressive decisions, he's chosen because he helps encourages progressives to vote come November. Just like if he was black or hispanic would help push those demographics to vote in the general election.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

idk if vance is a DEI hire as much as he is a right hand man hire.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was picked because he appeals to the wacko maga base while licking Trumps... uhhh... boots.

yeah that. And also fucking couches probably.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He appeals to the billionaire voting bloc. They have small numbers (larger than I’d like) of direct votes, but for some reason, they sway elections.

i think that might be trump considering how corrupt he seems to be. I think the real reason they sway elections is because they often have a lot of influence through funding and lobbying.

[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Polling wise VP’s have historically changed very little in elections.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 1 points 3 months ago

I think that VPs are also a deterrent of presidential assassination. If the VP is seen as worse than the president by the opposing party members, then no one will try to assassinate the president. However, if the VP is better, that president's life can be much shorter.

Would the Republicans prefer Walz as president? If yes, then he is a bad selection for VP. If no, Harris is safer as president.