this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
166 points (91.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2539 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure huffpost knew what they're implying. In truth he's vowing to continue his presidential run from prison if necessary. The headline on their actual article is clearer: "Trump Vows To Run For President From Prison If Convicted"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wouldn't a conviction of the January 6th insurrection bar him from office via the 14th Ammendment?

Kinda sure stoking a rebellion against the government is a bigly no-no.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Only if he is charged with either aiding or inciting an insurrection. It has to specifically be one of those charges, or actual treason based on all of the legal interpretations I have seen.

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So a felon can't vote but could run for president?

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well yea. A felon running for prez implies they are the right kind of felon: wealthy.

While a felon who can't vote is : poor, poc, not worthy of participating in our lovely, high-water mark democracy.

[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a felon, and I can vote.

Not a bullshit felony, either. I pled to 3 armed robbery charges, got 14 years with a mandatory 7 in North Carolina.

My sentence made me ineligible for parole, and when I was released they presented me with a document called "Restoration of Citizenship" which restored all rights (except firearm ownership I think. Not gonna test that one.)

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming that you're in a better place now where you aren't going to be committing more violent crimes, you should probably get that clarified.

In many states, felons do not have the right to vote. That's been a big push for certain segments of liberals, on the theory that people that can't vote are less personally invested in the society that they're a part of. E.g., they're unable to fully integrate, and therefore are more likely to reoffend.

[–] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been out more than 25 years, with no recidivism.

Not all states restore your rights automatically, but the wording on the document is quite clear about restoring voting rights.

Restoration of Citizenship is a vital document, just like a birth certificate.

Edit to add a bit of the relevant law:

All rights are automatically restored upon “unconditional discharge” of sentence or unconditional pardon. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 13-1. This language has been interpreted to include payment of all court debt, a barrier to voting ruled unconstitutional under the State constitution in September, 2020, that is the subject of ongoing litigation.1 The agency releasing the prisoner (or probationer) must file a certificate evidencing unconditional discharge and restoration of the rights of citizenship with the court in the county of conviction (North Carolina state offenses) or the county of residence (for offenses under federal law or the law of another state). § 13-2.

The paperwork I have mentions "...all rights including the right to vote..." I have gotten conflicting advice on whether that includes firearms, but I'm not pushing it. I can hunt with a bow.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Weird right? Somebody should probably do something to address both of those issues.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The Government doesn’t want you to know about this one trick!

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He did tell them to "March down there and fight like hell" just after Ghouliani said we need to have "Trial by combat."

That's inciting stupid people to do something stupid.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I agree that it was incitement. I would also personally argue that Donald Trump is in fact a traitor. However, my personal opinion and what he can be tried and convicted for by a jury of his peers are two entirely different things.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, but no.

First, Trump would have to be charged, and convicted, of treason, insurrection, etc., in order for that to apply. There's been no legal determination of that yet, and it's unlikely to come prior to the election.

Second, this presumes that Congress does what it's supposed to do, and refuses to swear in a president that has elected after committing treason, etc. If congress simply ignores section 3 of the 14A, then there's not really much of a remedy available to a typical citizen.