1144
Rule (files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cheddar@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Couldn't such device be delivered without people, like a remotely controlled rover? How does that prove that people made an actual landing on the Moon?

[-] yuri@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

Because there’s like 6 of em, and we know exactly which mission launched each one.

[-] StormWalker@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

You are correct, it proves nothing. None of these things prove that people have been on the moon. Unless you want it to. Then anything is proof 😅

[-] Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

Yea shure you guys think that nasa was able to land something on the moon with either remote control or fully automated and then after a sucessfull landing of a unmanned craft deploy a mirror angled so you can bounce back laser but you also say that PEOPLE were never up there? What is even needed as proof for you people?

[-] AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
1144 points (100.0% liked)

196

16284 readers
3276 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS