World News

22097 readers

140 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

146

AP News: A search is underway for missing submarine that takes people to see Titanic (apnews.com)

submitted 2 years ago by philz@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

...officials are working to get a remotely operated vehicle that can reach a depth of 6,000 meters (about 20,000 feet) to the site as soon as possible.

The 5-person submersible, named Titan, is capable of diving 4,000 meters or 13,120 ft. “with a comfortable safety margin,” OceanGate said in its filing with the court.

but...after looking up on Wikipedia

...a wreck that lies over 12,000 feet (3,700 m) below the surface...

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think they’re advertising the depth limit of the recovery vehicle, not claiming that the wreck is actually at 20,000 feet.

[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago

They probably need quite a bit of margin too if the craft accidentally got lost in a deeper area

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It might be best practice to use a vessel rated for considerably deeper than you actually go, in case of some problem in the hull?

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And/or it's just a description of a particular vehicle they're bringing that was most convenient to get there quickly.

[–] Projectionist@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

It's not like they're going to say, "oh, don't bring THAT recovery vehicle, it can go TOO deep."

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Maybe they're concerned that it no-clipped through the sea bottom and wound up deeper than the Titanic's current location?