this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
826 points (98.7% liked)

News

23300 readers
4256 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Trump is an idiot but I've always wondered why the u.s and mexico don't join up and use the same force on cartels that they do on middle Eastern militants. If they went after cartels the way they do jihadists across the planet, there wouldn't be cartels left

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What are you talking about bub?

The approach the USA has taken to declare war on has been an abysmal failure. I am pretty sure every single campaign of war on x has ended with x being now even more prominent than before.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure but the I'm not expecting the u.s to change. I'm just saying why go across the planet to fight criminals instead of the ones on your continent, but I know the answer is oil. They fucked to my country for nothing but a foothold in the region, at least go fuck some cartel people

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

They'll also fuck Mexico up while unsuccessfully fighting the cartels which is why the US military isn't welcomed there. America's invasion back in 1846 is still very much in the public's consciousness there as well.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just like there are not jihadists left... oh wait.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's easier to fight a gang than an ideology. It would work out better I think

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Not really. Just as killing a person doesn't kill an ideology, killing a person also doesn't kill the profit motives for cartels.

If anything it makes the problem worse. Because you've suddenly freed up territory in a very lucrative black market.

The solution to the drug problem is to instead kill the motivations people have for doing the drugs in the first place:

https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/what-does-rat-park-teach-us-about-addiction

This means fixing the housing crisis, guaranteeing people jobs, food, water, shelter, and medical support. It means embracing harm reduction policy. It means ending the war on drugs.

Drug use is a symptom of an unhealthy society. Fix the health of society and the symptoms will disappear, and with it the cartels as well.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

could also give people free healthcare so they can afford real medication.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or just kill the poor people by sending them to any meaningless war. /s

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 3 months ago

It's not a meaningless war. It's war for natural resources to allow CEOs pad their bank accounts with sweet, sweet government contracts to rebuilding this war torn nation. Also for oil.

Or we need to show another country how big our dick is by picking a fight with them.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Profits are always a risk-reward balance. If the risk goes up (druglords are more likely to be killed) but the price doesn't, then the market goes away.

Most likely they would just up the prices and use the new profits to buy weapons to defend themselves though.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When a rival cartel gets weakened, there is less supply with the same demand. So another cartel will always use that to raise their prices. So the market never goes away.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why do you reply to my comment with something that has nothing to do with my argument?

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It is the exact same topic

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

There's too much money in the drug trade. Violence is a cost of doing business. Thier children grow up safe in the United States, living in luxury from the poison we buy from them. They literally have lobbyists working against drug legalization because it would destroy their captive market.

Marijuana is still illegal federally and way past Hearst's hemp boycot to save his newspaper business, hint: it's the cartels working against legalization via lobbying.

https://www.democracynow.org/2011/2/8/headlines/hilary_clinton_says_us_cant_legalize_drugs_because_there_is_too_much_money_in_it

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It’s easier to fight a gang than an ideology.

When Bush first went into Iraq, he described it as a Crusade. For some crazy reason, people in the Arab world weren't thrilled with this language.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Create a problem and claim yourself to be the best solution. "Drugs are bad. Give us more power to combat it!"

Point the finger at 5 immigrants every day and ask the power over 300 million people to fix it.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

The Mexican politicians don’t want their families brutally tortured and killed.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

We've lent Mexico military assistance before. The issue is that the cartels spring from a fundamental lack of control and governance in the areas in question, which means that foreign military means simply can't fix the problem. At best, it can suppress open symptoms for a few years.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

The truth is we're winning against the cartels the same way we should have fought Al Qaeda, in the shadows. And by actually helping Mexico become less corrupt and more functional.

Sending the 101st in may be cathartic but it's not the right move. If things go badly then we can always default to a military occupation. But it really shouldn't be our first option. Or our second, or our tenth.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Notice how all the Middle East militants are gone after 20 years of American occupation? That's why we don't do that.

Tinfoil hat time: Also, significant forces on both sides of the border have a motive to keep the cartels running. Cartels spread money and influence around in politics, and they are black hole than has been used in the past to launder money and do other illegal shit for politicians. Not to mention, a (policy) restrictive border makes their business running drugs and people across the line more profitable and in-demand. Worst thing for the cartels would be open borders and an end to the war on drugs.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not why the u.s won't do it. I'm not saying it works but Americans aren't gonna stop just picking a new target every decade or two, may as well go for cartels

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Don't shit where you eat.

[–] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, if we couldn't exterminate the Taliban, it stands to reason we wouldn't be able the exterminate the cartels.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

They have to get far enough away from the western journalists so their massive volume of atrocities isn’t in the public consciousness.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

The oligarchy profits off the drug trade. They also profit off the wars. If it's happening, it's being ALLOWED to happen, by the oligarchy, because it benefits them.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Question : what/who stopped him? How?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

because this is not a planet made only for you and yours fucking imperialist

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Funny, your likely white, colonialist ass saying that to a native person.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can be anyone you want to be on the Internet can't you, tough guy

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Even a racist asshole

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago

Because Americans are too racist to support meaningful cooperation with Mexico.