Gaming

3127 readers

831 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

onlinepersona@programming.dev

Analyst: Windows on Arm is not ready for the complexities of the PC gaming landscape (www.gamedeveloper.com)

submitted 4 months ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/gaming@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17371614

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] dodos@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure what games do work, but I'm surprised over half of what they've tested are in a good state considering it's running on an emulation layer with immature drivers. Additionally, anti-cheat can't really be helped, that's an issue we've been dealing with on Linux for ages as well. I don't think anyone was really expecting it arm on windows to overtake x86 instantaneously, but from a technical standpoint it's not a bad start. Of course, things could be better, but they could be much worse.

[–] Veticia@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Microsoft convinced hardware manufacturers to support UEFI and TPM overnight. If they just said next Windows is going to be ARM only, software manufacturers would have to follow.