this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
1102 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60631 readers
3851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You know how Google's new feature called AI Overviews is prone to spitting out wildly incorrect answers to search queries? In one instance, AI Overviews told a user to use glue on pizza to make sure the cheese won't slide off (pssst...please don't do this.)

Well, according to an interview at The Vergewith Google CEO Sundar Pichai published earlier this week, just before criticism of the outputs really took off, these "hallucinations" are an "inherent feature" of  AI large language models (LLM), which is what drives AI Overviews, and this feature "is still an unsolved problem."

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eee@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

"It's your responsibility to make sure our products aren't nonsense. All we want to do is to make money off you regardless."

[–] pacology@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

These models are mad libs machines. They just decide on the next word based on input and training. As such, there isn’t a solution to stopping hallucinations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Are they now AI, large language models or AI large language models?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Whichever brings in the most shareholder value.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

What happens when you put a product manager in charge of a software company.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As well as no clue how not to make every product they have shit over time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

So crazy that humanity has so far allowed the idea of "hallucinations", even just the term, to be normalized and acceptable to any level into a product that's being forced into every layer of our daily existence.

Stop just going with it. Call out hallucinations on their face.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

I got a solution, stop being a lil baby and turn off the AI and go on to the next big thing. CRISPR, maybe? Not techbro enough? Make it like Crypto Crispr, only you own this little piece of DNA, and all the corporations that can read the ledger and get your biometrics

[–] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The moment a politician's kid drinks bleach because of Google's AI is the moment any regulatory action is taken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whyalone@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He only cares to make money for the rich shareholders and for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Looks like Google stopped the AI feature. No more AI suggestions at the top of the page after searching for something.

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious, are these hallucinations very prevalent? I'm outside under US so haven't seen the feature yet. But I have noticed that practically every article references the same glue incident.

So I'm not sure if the hallucinations are happening all the time, or everyone is just jumping on a handful of mistakes the AI made. If the latter, the situation reminds me of how every single accident involving a Tesla was reported on back in the day.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

It will confidently report inaccurate information. It's usually not so hilariously wrong, but it's still wrong.
For example, I was talking with someone about what constituents a "fruit" botanically, and I searched "are beans fruit", and it confidently told me that beans are not a fruit, botanically speaking, because they're a legume. It seems to have adapted, but that's a good example of a "small wrong" that's not uncommon at all.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›