Technology

37720 readers

432 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

Resurrecting Digg v3 (www.livefilter.com)

submitted 1 year ago by PlagueShip@lemmy.world to c/technology@beehaw.org

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Digg was my favorite website of all time, what people today can't experience is just how good the community was. I think that was due to the reputation system they used. A sufficiently advanced reputation system would fix a lot of problems with social media, with less censorship.

I have previously created a dating site, social network, custom forums, meetup-like event service, local classifieds, and a few video games. A few years ago as part of a 12-startups-in-12-months effort, I created a basic Digg-like site, livefilter.com. This doesn't have the reputation system yet, but that would be the eventual goal. My first focus was on an efficient, fast, smooth experience. For example, videos play instantly, full screen.

It didn't get much traction, so I haven't worked on it in a while. I haven't touched it in 3 years. What do you think, does it have promise, or should I give up? If people are interested and it becomes active, I'll work on it more.

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] kenton@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My vote is put that energy into the Fediverse!

[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not against joining the Fediverse, but I don't think they are going to support the features I want to implement.

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Seems like a relatively easy thing for reputation to be implemented in the lemmy framework no?

[–] AGTMADCAT@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you expand on why you'd want to autoplay full screen videos? I'm not sure I'm understanding you correctly, or if I am then I'm not understanding why that's desirable?

[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most sites you have to click the thumbnail, then click play, then click the fullscreen button. That said, it's optional under settings.

[–] prlang@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

You could write a front end client for Lemmy. Right now I think theirs only like one app for each platform, with lots of room for UX improvements. The site you have is fine but I know I won’t personally be investing any time that’s not backed by web standards, with distributed stake holders. I think maybe you’re asking the wrong crowd here because we’re all likely to be inclined against letting another digg/Reddit situation happen where the people that find themselves in a leadership position can ruin the whole thing

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most modern browsers don't allow auto-playing video at all, or only allow auto-play with content muted... How are you getting around that?

edit: I see you mean just make it the one interaction click to do all those things simultaneously.

[–] YMS@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

A few years ago as part of a 12-startups-in-12-months effort, [...] It didn’t get much traction

I think I can imagine a connection.

load more comments