this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
526 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38075 readers
373 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rule34IsAmazing@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I understand why they're doing this, but if you make a service that was once free, paid (whether with your time, or money), it's not a good look.

[–] ookees@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I'm in the camp that says you should really pay for premium. It's so worth the money. For every premium user that watches a video the creator gets a pretty good cut. Something like 55%. Blocking ads doesn't really hurt the creator too much. Your mainly just sticking it to Google. But if your someone who watches alot of YouTube consider premium, to help your favorite creators more. Especially you get Music included.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

I would consider it if YouTube had built in sponsorblock since I find YouTube videos unwatchable without it that I don't bother casting videos to the TV, and go through other methods to retain sponsorblock functionality.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sam@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'd be happy to pay for video content/video hosting, but I'm not happy with any of my money going to youtube or google. Peertube is the future. 😎

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SevYote@pawb.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For folks considering paying for YT, note that you get YT Music Premium bundled in with it. The music premium alone is only $2/mo cheaper than the bundle.

I got it when I bailed on Spotify, and gotta say, the app is a little less polished, but I don't miss Spotify a bit. Just putting it out there if you were looking for a push to get yourself off Spotify or a push to get YT ad-free, there ya go. It works out to $10/mo if you get the annual plan, so same as Spotify Premium, plus yanno, the YouTube benefits. It's a pretty decent deal tbh.

[–] themizarkshow@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I pay for Premium (bc I watch mostly from the TV using a console or AppleTV) but this sucks. Especially because how annoying and long a bunch of these ads are now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Well, this certainly explains my difficulty with YouTube over the last few days. Ironically, the piped instances still seem to be fine...

This might just be enough to push me primarily over to Rumble. There are fewer and fewer reasons to use YouTube and more and more reasons not to.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Steinsprut@szmer.info 7 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I took the L and started paying for YT Premium since you can't really get rid of ads on LG TV otherwise

Did it with a bit of malicious compliance and opted for Family plan using argentinian VPN, totaling at less than $3 a month (and constantly dropping) for 5 people.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If you can sideload Android apps SmartTubeNext is a great option https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTubeNext

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Honestly, I've always been surprised as to why YouTube even tolerates adblockers. It's basically a no-brainer for them to bake ads into the stream and disable skipping

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah please do, I will just stop using YouTube and that would be a good thing.

[–] uglytruck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use ytdl-sub to downloadt the newest videos from the channels I like and import into Jellyfin. No ads, nothing, just videos. Even thumbnails.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schizanon@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder if this would affect things like Newpipe (android YouTube client replacement with no ads) or even just playing streams via MPV. I assume that stuff is relatively safe since it's grabbing the actual video streams, but I'm sure there is still a way they could block them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dinodrinkstea@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

They can choke

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›