It might just kill Amazon, ApplePay, Youtube and 20 other unicorns.
On the other hand, it might not.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15914 readers
12 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
One of the two option is a lot more probable than the other. It's easy to guess witch one...
I prefer to read this as 'his dream that he had as a 24 year old' because 24 year olds are generally not very smart and have bad ideas that are too ambitious
Lots of 24 year olds are very ambitious and excited about changing their communities for the better. They come off as energetic, but naive.
With mentorship, experience, and a network of like minded people to collaborate alongside, they can channel that energy and temper it against the experience of their mentors to produce incredible accomplishments.
Unfortunately, 24 year old Musk got networked with a bunch of Stanford tech freaks and mentored by Wall Street ghouls. All his ambition was channeled into salesmanship, without concern for quality or consistency.
So now he's got a quarter trillion dollars at his disposal and all he knows how to do is make pitch desks for his investors. The next generation of 24 year olds forced to work with him (because he's squatting over a ton of capital and IP) get burned out quickly and turned off of the idea of contributing meaningfully to the future of US engineering.
So we've created a black hole of shit that sucked in one ambitious younger person, larded him up with cash, and pulled in two decades of subsequent ambitious young people to squander their time and talent on bullshit make work.
A lot of people think this is a mistake etc.
That's right, 
is burning tens of billions of dollars on awful ideas on purpose!
Jokes aside, aren't things bad enough that these functions/services are run at the whims of a handful of billionaires? Can't they see how bad it would be to cede that much power to one dude who is completely free from public scrutiny?
How can you look at Twitter and think, "Yeah, I want everything to ~~function~~ behave like this!"? 
that picture: me to interior designer: "Yes I would like to work inside a lightbulb"
I put the 'white supreme' interior design option on the proposal as a joke, but it was his first choice. It also is the least effort for me as the designer, so fuck it.
You have to wonder what it feels like to snort the amount of copium that tech bros are on. Just a lifetime of failing upwards and truly believing you aren't a dumbass
Big number goes up means I get smarter
this is a still from a video where the three guys on the right are embarrasingly obsequious towards Musk
NOOO!!! Not those 20 unicorns. What does the bloodthirsty elongated muskrat have against those majestic, mythical stallions.
Honestly, he might be trying to achieve immortality at this rate. Should we try to stop him?