this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
991 points (98.1% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
2791 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 78 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This assumes workers own the means of production.

Under capitalism, boss tells all the workers to get fucked.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That which ought to be is not influenced by what is. It's true that worker control over the means of production is preferable to capitalism, but neither scenario here actually requires it. In fact, if the economy is fully automated, it would imply that the means of production couldn't be owned by the workers, since there wouldn't be any. That's how you get post-scarcity space communism. Socialism would ensure the longevity and existence of an arrangement that results in automation leading to better lives for everyone rather than human extinction. However, I'm beginning to suspect that with the time frame we're working with, aiming for socialism to the detriment of achieving any such arrangement might be a serious misplay on our part. Of course, that opens the possibility for humanity to be subjugated by an oppressive regime of immortal cyborg oligarchs. Even so, this horrifying possibility still preserves the opportunity for rebellion and revolution to set things aright whereas extinction would be ultimate defeat.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

You just accidentally described both The Dune Universe, and The Warhammer 40K Universe.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yay, a robot took over my job! Now I am free to closely monitor it until I stop caring about the mistakes!

Edit: And get fired!

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Closely monitor it for less pay!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Automate your job but don't tell your boss.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Automate, but maje sure you take ownership of the production and get paid accordingly. Your tip is usually the best way to accomplish it.

unless you can spin it into a business to business service that you can sell after leaving the company to many more and paid more than your job's salary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 months ago (7 children)

If I have no job, I have no money.

Who's going to buy the stuff these robots are building?

[–] skygirl@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The search for short term profits doesn't give a fuck

That's next quarter's problem

[–] Masterblaster420@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

it's a monster and no one is in control of it. it must be destroyed.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 10 points 6 months ago

Other rich people. Robots will just stop making $10k cars and start making yachts. Rich people will just keep the game going between themselves.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If people don't have money, people can't buy the goods being produced, demand will plummet and supply will skyrocket leading to the logical conclusion that a UBI is necessary to supplement life in an automated world. If that doesn't happen, I Guess revolution?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Woah, that's dangerous thinking! Why don't we bring back house-servants instead to give all of these filthy poors Gainful Employment(tm)?

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or…we could say “fuck the poors, my house servant will be a robot”.

To be fair though I think that the really rich will find another way to use us for their amusement.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Well, they have robots for the actual tasks, the human employees are just there so they have someone to lord over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Masterblaster420@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

everyone here should look at the Venus Project. We keep struggling to understand how automation makes sense in a capitalist society. SPOILER: it doesn't. The entire system has to be re-imagined or we perish and the owners flourish (without us).

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah the owners are always going to get the labor as cheap as possible. There is no way you'll get profits from a. Company that literally doesn't employ you.

In the right hand pic the person doesn't work for the company. Why does the pic imply they do?

If a company is fully automated and has no workers do they pay everyone? Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 6 months ago (6 children)

If corporations cared more about people and less about money this may just work.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Until there is no longer a massive bill to start a company this is a pipe dream. Who's name is the mortgage under is all you have to ask before the model breaks down...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

We should tax every company the equivalent of all the workers' salaries (adjusted for modern cost of living) they automate out of a job and use the money to fund a UBI.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Don't give me that do-goody-good bullshit!

[–] WilderSeek@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Many inventions created to "free people" ended up landing them with expectations to work even harder with their newfound "free time"—and they ended up being pigeon-holed into more limited jobs. This is especially true for women as appliances were created to help free them from domestic duties, but they have been landed into still doing those and working full-time or more.

[–] Masterblaster420@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

this could be reality right now if we overthrew the owners. who keeps the owners in power? the conservative right. property is an unalienable right to them. what can we do? destroy the conservative right by any means necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›