this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
96 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

1573 readers
8 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"We have a technical debt that stretches back many decades."

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They adopted the system in 1998, when actually floppy floppies were already obsolete. Oof.

[–] Lwaxana@startrek.website 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's called proven technology sweaty.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

CDs were released in 1982 and pretty damn stable. One year after 3.5 floppys.....6 years after 5.25 floppys.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

ISO 9660 wasn't around until '88, and even then, its read-only capability paired with high costs wouldn't make it viable until maybe a decade later ... ironically, around the time the system was deployed.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean 1989 was the last time I used a 5.25 in elementary before everything was switched to 3.5 with the IBM Model 30.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I know I was still using 5¼" floppies at least a bit into the early '90s, though it's been long enough that exact years elude me.

I was also still developing technology that used 3½" diskettes well into the first decade of the new millennium - though I finally managed to migrate newer systems to CD-R around the end of that decade.

[–] squeakycat@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago

That's a measure of success to me. Systems that have run for so long and continue to run effectively are to be commended, not ridiculed.

The article quotes the agency as mentioning the floppies not being the biggest worry. I wish it went into more detail of what shortcomings the current system has and what improvements such a shift to more modern infra would bring.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I like the part of the quote you omitted:

"We have to maintain programmers who are experts in the programming languages of the '90s in order to keep running our current system, so we have a technical debt that stretches back many decades," Tumlin told San Francisco's KQED in February 2023.

They say that as if most of the most popular languages in the '90s aren't still in common use today. I guess what he really means is that they managed to pick something that was obscure proprietary garbage even back then, and should've known better.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well, it's increasingly difficult to find specific C experts.

Edit: downvotes from people who obviously don't work in my field

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

what, its not like they are near a technical mecca of any kinda out there in cali, of course they would be decades out of date!

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I'm 20 minutes away from multiple population centers, in Bay area California, and on a good night I get 4 mB/s download. We need public energy and data ASAP, private oligarchs are fucking us over so hard.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There aren't even decent broadband options in Silicon Valley. None of the "innovations" actually make it out of the plush offices into the community.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sonic is offered around the bay area and silicon valley. It's fantastic. I sadly don't have it in my current place, but previously had their gigabit fiber


symmetric, uncapped, reliable, and north of 900Mbps on iperf (fast.com would claim 1.0Gbps).

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, finally, but obviously not ubiquitously. They never offered it in any of the places I lived there, either.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or you could just virtualize the machine in an emulator and run it from disk images. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To hard for the "fake it 'til you make it"ers of old

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I want in safety-critical infrastructure: more abstractions and points of failure. Let's slap that on a RasPi while we're at it

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago