this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
193 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

48924 readers
974 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, mostly i use REHL based distros like Centos/Rocky/Oracle for the solutions i develop but it seems its time to leave..

What good server/minimal distro you use ?

Will start to test Debian stable.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaldeiraG@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

For server, Debian is great :) i use ubuntu 20.04 lts personally

[–] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Any issues with CentOS stream for your work? Could always switch to Fedora server too if you wanted to keep the same structures and such, but separate some from RedHat.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Red Hat has alot of sway with Fedora considering they pulled those codecs out of it. That's when I realized it isn't really a community distro.

[–] knowncarbage@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

It think it's more for RH/IBM to test new stuff on the community as opposed to something like Debian or Gentoo that actually has a fairly clear community commitment.

I don't recall a lot community polling and discussion when they moved to systemd, btrfs or wayland.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] americanwaste@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Have to also add to the voices recommending Debian stable. I've used it now for ten straight years after I stopped distro-hopping for my servers and desktop, and I cannot imagine using another distro. It's incredibly stable, but the best part of Debian is the absolutely expansive repositories that even the Arch User Repository can't beat. Very rarely do I ever need to use Flatpak (ugh) for packages, or look to add in new external repositories.

[–] crunchi@mas.to 4 points 2 years ago

@americanwaste @bzImage
Honestly Ive had the inverse experience where the package I need is only in AUR and not debian repos, but at least we can agree that Flatpak and Snap are terrible

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't understand what's happening at Red Hat. First they pull the codecs out of Fedora which is supposed to be a community distro so why are company lawyers involved? Now basically closing their source code. I mean technically not violating the GPL cause you only have to have your source available to your customers.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Codecs were never legal to include, community distro or not. The RedHat lawyers told Fedora that, and Fedora removed them

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not really. Any customer can share GPL code, after they get it. Red Hat can't change that, if they use GPL. The issue is, from my understanding, that Red Hat can have some non GPL code to build the final product. So sharing the GPL code itself would not be enough to build a 1 to 1 binary compatible distribution.

At least at theory, because we don' know all details yet. Imagine a situation like the Chrome browser vs Chromium.

[–] somegeek@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I would definitely give openSUSE a try. such a solid distro. Debian is also great, popOS seems likeable, nixOS is very very solid, I've used Arch, Manjaro and opensuse myself. currently on arch. but I highly recommend openSUSE

[–] Jcb2016@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Debian is stable. Arch is bleeding edge and vanilla. if you want something on arch you got to install it and follow the arch wiki

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Debian is my go-to for containers and VMs. Stable af. For my laptop and desktop I run pop_os.

[–] reitoei@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Slackware because it rules.
OpenSuse for RPM and company backing.
EndeavourOS for "lazy" Arch install.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] G0R3B0XXX@dataterm.digital 4 points 2 years ago

I have utilized Debian and Minimum Ubuntu as an alternative to Centos with reasonably pleasurable results

I do also like Absolute for crafting the perfect lightweight install, but it's kind of a pain in the ass.

[–] mordekaiq90@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Gentoo! it can be anything you want on any platform

[–] bertmacho@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Void Linux. It just works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jsonborne@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I'm also moving away from RHEL. I have 3 RHEL servers right now, a hypervisor host, a podman vm, and a Samba share vm. I really liked that you could specify regulatory compliance at install time. Makes it really easy for standing up compliant servers. Are there any distros that do something similar?

[–] minimalpurple@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I thought very similar after the RHEL moves that Red Hat has made. I was thinking OpenSUSE or Debian, but I am still unsure as what I am going to do.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] databender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

SLAAAAAAACKWAAAAARE!!!! Slackware is good.

Debian is a nice second.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›