like peas in a pod. to anyone not familiar: RFK is a gigantic anti-vaccine crank whose rallies have attracted Proud Boys, whose organization thinks COVID was some sort of Marxist plot and a plandemic, and who has heavily leaned on QAnon rhetoric. the ties here aren't particularly surprising--what Democrat would support any of this? lol
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10257 readers
293 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This seemed obviously true from just looking at the things he's said and done. Still, appreciate the journalism being done.
RFKJ gives "Nepobaby" a bad name.
This is exactly the kind of thing that Dems have been doing. Back a crackpot and hope they win and run in the general election.
No, this is what the Republicans are doing...
We've been doing it too.
The article is literally about the opposite happening though, so your comment reads both as a total non-sequitur and like you didn't read even the headline.
I'm sorry you didn't understand the point I was making at all.
The comment is trying to point out, albeit obtusely, that democrats have also funded crazy people on opposite end of the political spectrum. In 2022 the democrats funded far right candidates in hopes they would win the primary and be an easy victory royale for the dem candidate. The comment is trying to analogize these two things, which is fair because it is a similar political strategy.
Trump actually was one of those candidates. However, I don't think it is directly analogous. Trump won and it was bad for Democrats. If RFK wins on the other hand, it would certainly be good for Republicans.
Right, but this is an example of funding a far-right candidate in a Democratic primary, where they stand essentially no chance of winning it. There's some other goal here, such as landing trolls inside the Democratic convention to disrupt the ability to negotiate a party platform.
The dems are doing that, eh? Care to back that up with some examples? We know of one very Santos example from the republicans.