this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
877 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37823 readers
343 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The exchange is about Meta's upcoming ActivityPub-enabled network Threads. Meta is calling for a meeting, his response is priceless!

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Metacortechs@lemmy.stellarvortex.com 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This has me thinking, is there a space set aside for putting profits over people instances out and center so admins can preemptively defederate and/or block them?

I haven't found one yet but I am rather new to this.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I think it'll be harder than that, even.

Meta doesn't need to spin up an instance to abuse user data on the fediverse, they just need an app that can read it. A hypothetical meta fediverse app could allow users to select their own instance and still read and collect data on the connected instances. As far as I know, there is no way in the protocol to prevent this.

[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Our exchange here is public, a gift to humanity and all aliens that might stumble upon it. If meta can make money from it, so be it. But anyone else can just as well.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Except they can build proprietary code on top of it and take over open-sourced activitypub adoption

It's just another way to kill competition

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bobby_tables@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (19 children)

I’m surprised by all the negativity. Is it not a good thing Meta is going to use open standard instead of a proprietary one?

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Meta is not going to "use" this technology, they want to own it. And youncsnnbe certain they will try their best to build a walled garden with a Facebook login, so the masses pick their form of fediverse rather than the one not controlled by big tech.

Peoples negativity comes from experience with these corporations. You are probably pretty young if you don't see how bad they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] dashlander@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have mixed feelings about Facebook being a part of this, but I honestly don't know if I'd want to get closer to Facebook. 💀

[–] the_kgb@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

what are your mixed feelings? truly, what do you think is the positive of meta getting involved?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

We shan't bend the knee!

[–] hexadecimal@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Meta does some interesting open source work, extra hands on fediverse open source might be reasonable.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›