this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13339 readers
97 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This paper focused on how much two prominent fact-checking sources, The Washington Post’s Fact Checker and PolitiFact, agreed on the statements to fact-check and the strength of their deceptiveness ratings. The study examined presidential fact-checks, and the data suggest some divergence in what to check. Deceptiveness ratings were moderately correlated for The Washington Post and PolitiFact, suggesting general agreement on the presence of falsity but indicating variability in severity assessments of false or misleading statements.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here