this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
351 points (99.7% liked)

Android

17682 readers
8 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 68 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah that’s because they can’t sell your location data to the police.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because they have to comply with lawful subpoenas for free.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they could still sell it for money if they wanted to, that was my point.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If it's on sale the nsa probably bought it already to be honest

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

even if it wasn't, NSA would've probably bought it already anyway

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I could see them blocking it too maintain an exclusivity deal

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Stole. The NSA steals data from companies like Google. That's why, for example, everything in data centers and everything sent between them is encrypted.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And also because Google doesn't sell data.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Hahaha. That’s a joke right?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Do they sell data or sell services using data they collect? Honest question.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I believe generally not. They sell the results of processed data, but the data is their golden goose. Why sell it wholesale, when you can charge for every use of it?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That's what I thought. So they do in a sense sell our data but not directly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised how blatantly companies sell very personal data on a person. Google's not going to do it openly because of pr, but a little subsidiary might

Google probably isn't going to sell everything, but it's pretty likely there's an offshoot company who will sell individual data.

Their data is indeed their golden goose, but if they sell data for individuals at $300 or even $10 a pop, no one is going to get enough of their dataset to compete. They could even rate limit... Although if companies start to pay a billion or 10 to get full data dumps on a country, they might refocus on collection.

After all, the data isn't the true golden goose... It's the golden eggs that they process and sell. It's their ability to collect data that's most valuable

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I challenge you to produce a shed of evidence that Google sells user data.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Where do I go to buy a list of your location history off Google if it's not true?

[–] cumberboi@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok I just went down a very deep internet rabbit hole and went from believing google definitely sells data to it doesn't sell data to it sells data (kinda). I'd recommend this article on RTB's which explains how google advertisements actually work and how they leak your data (including your location).

I'd also recommend watching the short video by Brave linked in the article - I didn't understand the first part but the actual article explains it quite well, the end is the juicy part.

Hope this helps!

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That was quite informative! Thank you for the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If anything they'd be buying since they're the ones presenting ads... The whole data selling discussion online is always ridiculous. Who are these mystical data buyers ready to shell out billions for crappy "data" (does anyone participating in these discussions actually have a definition of what they think this ridiculously non specific ""data"" even is?) to present slightly better ads to users? Why would Google sell this data, shouldn't they want to keep it to themselves?

[–] Still@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

selling your data refers to people buying ads and being like I want to show my dog food ad to 100,000 people who have a dog, and then Google only shows the ad to people who have a dog

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I know of a SaaS company that charges for their products to end users for a monthly fee. They make significantly more money selling the data of their users to 3rd parties than they do from subscriptions. Also, they figured this out after the fact, it wasn't a core business component when they launched, but they still ended up raising the monthly fees due to "inflation".

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

You don't kill the golden goose.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 61 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Use Organic maps and continue contributing to openstreetmap

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Have not heard of this but I'm looking into it now. Thanks!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah street complete ( the app mostly used to contribute to osm) is really cool and a lot of fun

[–] Vendul@feddit.de 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you do crime, leave your phone at home

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah if you attend a protest, go to church or vote leave your phone at home.

Damn the world is getting crazy

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Where is the problem with going to the church?

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You've never seen The Kingsman?

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Likely not. Apologies for missing the reference, but I don't have a clue

[–] Pilkins@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Look up "Kingsman church scene" or watch the movie. The scene is one of the best action scenes. Won't necessarily spoil the movie but will give up some info.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The government will know you went to church. That's pretty scary if you ask me. Church should be a safe place and having the government track you literally anywhere is concerning. Not to mention it opens up the door for people to be watched even more because they attended a church, mosque or something else.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, I. In this country I get more worried that I don't attend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Technically speaking, anywhere that your face/body/gait can be seen/analysed, is where you will be tracked. At this point, the most prudent thing to do is to completely divorce your online identity from your physical self.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 17 points 11 months ago

I feel like the vast majority of headlines about this stuff could use clarification of "without warrant."

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why bother with Google when they can just ask your telco.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Because that data tells them a lot less and requires a paper trail, which they don't like.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Telco doesn't have the same level of precision I think.

Yes and no

The Telco can say between what antennas you are. In urban areas with lots of antennas that's still pretty accurate to almost say what building. Especially with 5G the number of antennas and accuracy go upto in some cases centimeter/inch accuracy so better than GPS. That last case would be in a mall with small antenna in each corridor.

In rural areas with data switched off that's more like somewhere in that square mile, way worse than GPS.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

They can still access it locally, if Google wanted to protect people then they wouldn’t store location data

[–] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

How about the case where I explicitly want them to store my location data? I mean I really use and like that feature.

[–] lukini@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

I want them to. I opted in and use that feature.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

I'm using this feature and am looking forward to it becoming on-device.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

Like Apple, Google also doesn't want competitors in collecting user data

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί