this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30557 readers
278 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pantslesswonder@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t tell if this is good or not. My gut says no, but also maybe yes?

[–] MoonRocketeer@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The cynical side of me says they're doing this to sell one of the halves off to one of the other publishers. The optimist in me hopes this leads to one more publisher in this space; we sorely need less consolidation.

[–] ascagnel@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's my thought as well -- the licensed sports game market is probably more reliable (and generates more revenue vs. development cost) than originals, and they can "streamline" their business by splitting the originals business off for a sale. Not including sports probably makes the originals side more attractive to platform holders, as most sports games probably include provisions that require multiplatform releases (see also: the MLB signing a publishing deal for Sony's "The Show" on non-Sony platforms).

[–] MoonRocketeer@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah and we can all knock their sports division all we want but it brought in money. With this change and in the possible outcome that they're not out to be bought, we'll have to see if the originals side will become a lot more risk-averse and pivot more into the GaaS market than they already were.

I'm interested to see where this goes.

load more comments
view more: next ›