this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
537 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2559 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sweetcuppincakes@sh.itjust.works 117 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No borders? Guys the Dems aren't that left

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Also, don’t the Dems want to let girls NOT have balls? Its the Republicans who get grumpy when Trans women get gender affirming surgery.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obama doubled the amount of border patrol agents. Which seems like a much better use of money than a wall, at least according to… the border patrol.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

*The amount of border patrol doubled while Obama was in office. It might seem pedantic but it is not. Anything like this requires Congress to approve the budgetary increase which means it happened because of multiple parties not just the White House.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Under his lead. You are being pedantic. It was part of his states goals and platform. And his party overwhelmingly voted for it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Traditionally border patrol pushes have been failures, they get more staff but generally super underqualified and often times cartel linked. Yes it's a better use of money but training the ones we have to actually be effective is better use.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

My point is more that you cannot say it is because of Obama when Congress has to sign off on it as well. It's like blaming Reagan for the tax cuts of the 80's when the Democrats controlled Congress and passed those bills.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty sure that's the joke - if only the dems were as progressive as the cons make them out to be...
(that' how I took it anyway)

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 71 points 1 year ago

Don't threaten me with a good time!

[–] boot@lemmy.loungerat.io 53 points 1 year ago

tired: truck nuts

wired: girl balls

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Republicans are the ones who keep trying to make those girls still have balls

But also don’t threaten me with a good time

[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago

Fuck yeah, this sounds amazing!

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I normally hate the Democratics due to them being just being the lesser of two evils but I must say this makes them look great

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the Dem leadership in the minds of Republican demagogues (but I repeat myself) are many times better than the ones in reality, always have been.

[–] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That's it, i'm moving to the US right now.

[–] emerald@lemmy.place 9 points 1 year ago

I actually love that I can't tell if this is for or against the Dems

I have to assume it's supposed to be against, because nobody who actually votes Democrat thinks that's what they support

Dude! You already struck oil! No need to keep digging.

[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*Vote Democratic.

Vote Democrat is just bad grammar.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Democrats are one of the two parties in the US so "vote democratic" doesn't make sense. How else would you vote?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Behaviorbabe@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I usually do but I haven’t got my balls yet where are they

[–] BolshoyToster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[–] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Vote Democratic*

load more comments
view more: next ›