Technology

34912 readers

236 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

Quad9 Blocks Pirate Site Globally After Sony Demanded €10,000 Fine * TorrentFreak (torrentfreak.com)

submitted 1 year ago by seasonone@opidea.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] starlord2014@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Run your own DNS Resolver like Unbound.

[–] al_ways_gone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do tld providers ignore this or why isn't it getting blocked there too? Not just regarding this particular case

[+] Syl@jlai.lu 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're a non-profit IIRC, so no money to battle Sony in court

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup, they are trying to establish easy precedence. Quad9 has not enough funds to battle the suit, even tough they are probably the least guilty party.

Targeting DNS services is an interesting strategy, but if you know how the technology works it's also a silly one. Attacking those who only translate your request to access a site hosting copy righted content instead of the operator or host... or users for that matter.

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but if you know how the technology works

That's like what, 2% of online users globally? Let's say pirates are marginally more tech savvy, so maybe 10% of pirates? If their plan works and they can get google to block access to all sorts of streaming and torrenting sites, that will massively reduce the numbers of people accessing illegal content.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.lumendatabase.org/

Targeting DNS and killing traffic to an entire site is easier than the constant drumbeat of sending out takedowns for specific links to everyone. Way over the top, and of course they wouldn't try it against a big opponent. Would love to see them make a case that YouTube should be globally DNS blocked, after all look at all the infringing videos and music that's on there daily.

[–] 4am@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The defendant is liable as a perpetrator because it makes its DNS resolver available to Internet users and, through this, it refers to the canna.to service with the infringing download offers relating to the music album in dispute,” the Court wrote.

Scary, since this could essentially establish a precedent that anyone who hosts DNS must concede to these types of demands. That includes Google, Meta, Verizon, CloudFlare, and every ISP on the planet. As well as the root servers.

Fuck that noise.

load more comments